![]() ![]() |
Watson - a perfect solution? |
Aug 15 2008, 03:16 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 929 Joined: 13-August 08 Member No.: 16 |
Watson is the name of a gadget that shows you how many energy your home is using. Maybe you would like it, because it has a modern design and shows you in small charts and graphs where to save energy. But isn't it just a waste of money? Would you buy such a gadget? I would not.
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2008, 11:22 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 18-August 08 Member No.: 603 |
I think it depends on how much it was in all honesty! If you are looking to save the pennies spending copious amounts on such a device would not be too appealing. However if it wasn't too expensive I think it has the potential to be a nifty little gadget.
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2008, 09:19 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 929 Joined: 13-August 08 Member No.: 16 |
Maybe you are right. It is useful for saving pennies but not for getting rich. It would be a little gadget for somebody who likes to say "Take care of the pence and the pounds will take care of themselves." But I am still not shure if Watson is profitable!?
|
|
|
|
Aug 26 2008, 11:07 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 18-August 08 Member No.: 603 |
I don't know...it is a matter of expenditure vs savings, I don't have one so I don't know how much money it saves (although I imagine this would differ from person to person anyway depending upon personal consumption) nor do I know how much it costs!
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2008, 03:39 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 929 Joined: 13-August 08 Member No.: 16 |
Can you find a link to a picture? I cannot find it anymore. Please halpe! Thank you....
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2008, 03:41 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 18-August 08 Member No.: 603 |
Here's a picture- rather funny looking!
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
|
Aug 29 2008, 03:58 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 929 Joined: 13-August 08 Member No.: 16 |
Thanks, is that helpful for all the other members? Now you can imagine what we are talking about...
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 08:49 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Wannabe ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 82 Joined: 24-October 07 Member No.: 104 |
Surely if it is meant to save you energy it shouldn't have lights all over it - beats the object wouldn't you say?
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 08:57 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 161 Joined: 1-September 08 Member No.: 1,254 |
Minx you have a good point! Maybe you should be on thier design team and tear them a new one! It should be black as coal in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 01:13 PM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 929 Joined: 13-August 08 Member No.: 16 |
But they would sell even fewer of this gadgets if it is ugly. It has to have all this stylish lights to gain attention....But @ Minx: you are right, it makes no sense to sell an energy saving product and equip it with so many lights!
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 01:22 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 161 Joined: 1-September 08 Member No.: 1,254 |
There should be otherways to make it aesthetically pleasing without the lights, stylish and lights needn't be exclusive to eachother.
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2008, 10:45 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 929 Joined: 13-August 08 Member No.: 16 |
Aesthetically pleasing.....nice words
|
|
|
|
Sep 3 2008, 11:56 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 18-August 08 Member No.: 603 |
Meli wrote:
Aesthetically pleasing.....nice words That's very true, otherwise it would just be a box claiming to save you money, but without the visual depictions so you'd be left in the dark! (Pun intented |
|
|
|
Sep 3 2008, 03:54 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 161 Joined: 1-September 08 Member No.: 1,254 |
Nomad wrote:
> Meli wrote: > Aesthetically pleasing.....nice words That's very true, otherwise it would just be a box claiming to save you money, but without the visual depictions so you'd be left in the dark! (Pun intented Okay, I'll concede that 'some' lights are may be required, but surely judging by that picture they've still gone a bit overboard! |
|
|
|
Sep 15 2009, 01:25 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Beginner Group: Members Posts: 1 Joined: 15-September 09 Member No.: 3,113 |
Any pics bout this watson thing? Really don't get what this gadget is all about. Thanks!
Regards, mimic143 Placement financier |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Calendar

Watson - a perfect solution?

Aug 15 2008, 03:16 PM



